Layout Image

Archive for UFC

MMA Fighter Dies After Fight

Thursday, July 1st, 2010
I have to admit I love all sports. Everything from MMA to bowling. I haven’t always felt this way but as I age and become slower, I seem to appreciate any athletic ability, even if it is throwing a ball down a lane.

 

However, when it comes to Mixed Martial Arts there is a large attraction for me. Even though it is a bloody aggressive sport, and people get hurt. There seems to be enough drama with the creation of the Ultimate Fighter and the dedication it takes to step in the octagon.

I also know it is not for everyone! I read somewhere that the attraction is waining a little bit even with the explosion of the UFC. I don’t see the sport leaving prime time any time soon, but I don’t see it lasting any longer than the poker craze did. But who knows it might just replace WWE?

However recently the sport suffered a blow when a tragic death occurred. Michael Kirkham is the second fighter to die from injuries sustained in mixed martial arts competition in North America.

I want to start by sending my sympathy to the family and have zero desire to make light of what happened. There is nothing that can replace someones life and it is a tragedy when it is cut short by a sport.

What I do want to explore is if this death is going to effect MMA in anyway. I wonder what the backlash will be for those who hate the sport or even for those who love the sport. Will this mans death effect it in either way.

I understand that this sport carries an enormous risk! But I also understand that these guys train like crazy and know what they are doing. They have strong camps that teach these guys how to fight and avoid injury as much as you can in a fighting sport.

The sport has improved in its safety and officiating, just compare matches from five years ago to those you see today, you will immediately notice all the changes.

However, that does not help this situation. The sport is fought in a cage and filled with cheers from every hit that lands on someones face and we love to watch the knock outs.

So I wonder, with perhaps the first death in MMA fighting in North America, will the sport suffer and take a hit, or will it continue on without any recourse? What do you think?

Website content

Dana White UFC 116 Video Blog – 6/29

Tuesday, June 29th, 2010
UFC asked:

Dana White video blog leading up to UFC 116 on Saturday, July 3rd on Pay-Per-View. Go to 116.UFC.com for full event detail.

Caffeinated Content

Bob Reilly Needs to find a Better Agenda

Tuesday, June 2nd, 2009

Bob Reilly New York State Assemblyman

There must be an election coming up because Bob Reilly seems to be pulling out all of the stops to make sure that he does everything possible to make sure Mixed Martial Arts does not come to New York.  Bloody Elbow quotes Reilly as saying:

“There is overwhelming, widespread opposition to [MMA],” Reilly says. “Many of my constituents come up to say, ‘You’re doing the right thing. How can we have this?’ It’s a violent sport that is harmful and damaging. Violence begets violence. It helps create a culture in our society of domestic violence, of bullying, of violence against gays, of illegal gun use. It’s the job of state legislatures to pass laws against that sort of stuff, and then we put something like ultimate fighting as our form of entertainment?”

Reilly has made weak comparisons to violence begetting violence and MMA in the past, and he continues to do so.  In an article written by Ben Fowlkes for Sports Illustrated Fowlkes asks Reilly, “…harming your opponent to the point of unconsciousness is one of the ways you win a boxing match, isn’t it?”  Reilly’s reply is, “It’s not a stated goal, though.”

Again, I repeat from a previous post, one of boxing’s stated goals is harming your opponent to the point of unconciousness.  I am not understanding how Mixed Martial Arts has anything to do with domestic violence, bullying, violence against gays, or illegal gun use.  This guy is a joke.  He must have a weak agenda because he can’t find anything better to fight for.

Bad Blood between Tito Ortiz and Dana White

Friday, May 15th, 2009

From time to time we will hear about the bad blood between Tito Ortiz and Dana White.  This video found on MMA Blips shows how bad it is, at least from Tito’s perspective. Tito reminds me of a class I took in college about dealing with unions. The whole reason that unions were started (way back in the day) is because of what Tito is talking about. He feels like he (and other fighters) work so hard, get out into the ring, take risk, and then they get just a small portion of the take that the UFC makes from each event. Tito calls on other fighters to boycott the UFC for a couple of events so that they can get it to change. I am all for fairness in the sport, and people getting what they deserve for the risk that they take. Tito doesn’t bring it up in the interview (and I don’t know if he acknowledges) the risk that the promoters and owners of the UFC take in preparing a show like the upcoming UFC 98, May 23rd.  Is the risk physical?  No.  But there is substantial financial risk, that can totally ruin people.  The biggest problem with his argument, to me, comes back to economics.  There are up and coming fighters all over the world who want a shot at the UFC.  Most of them will do almost anything for that shot.  Many of them have never made the money they can make for one fight in the octagon.  This does not include the endorsements that they can make by fighting.  As long as those guys are out there, and they are willing to fight for what the UFC pays, and as long as the UFC is the biggest show in town, it is going to be hard to force the change.  I suspect the reason that Dana White is so hard nosed, and hard to deal with is because he feels like he holds all of the cards.  I also suspect that with all of the fights and success that Tito has had, he is not doing to bad off financially.  Should Tito have gotten paid more, a larger cut of the action for his fights?  I don’t know, but I applaud him for taking his stand, and walking away, when he did not feel like he was getting his fair share.


GunBroker.com Online Gun Auction

Dana White on ESPN

Thursday, May 14th, 2009

I have been seeing some posts about Dana White, and if he can take the UFC, and MMA to the next level. This is a video I found on ESPN which shows some of the history of Dana White, and how he got the UFC to where it is today.  This shows what White has done for MMA, and also some of the controversy that surrounds who he is.  For a guy with “barely a high school education,” he has done a good job of promoting the sport to what it is today.

Fedor Emilianenko is one of those guys that if you met him on the street, although a good sized guy, is pretty unassuming. He is does not look like he is cut from granite, but when you watch this video I found on MMA Scraps, you too will wonder if Fedor is the greatest fighter ever. He is lightning fast, has a good standup game, and his ground game is incredible. Check it out:

Tito Ortiz Supports PETA

Friday, May 1st, 2009

I am not a real big PETA fan, mostly because they seem like a bunch of fanatical nut jobs that like to spray paint people’s fur coats (while they are wearing them, I might add). I also have been known to eat a steak or a pork chop from time to time, which I believe would put me at odds with PETA’s core philosophy. That being said, I have not really seen much from them in recent years, and so I don’t know if their strategy has changed. I do know that I would support Tito and PETA in this dog fighting thing. Below is a video from PETA, which Tito did to support eliminating dog fighting in our communities which I found on MMABlips.   So here is possibly the only support you will find of PETA from this carnivore.


Comments (0)

MMA in New York

Monday, March 23rd, 2009


UFC Store The Ultimate Fighter Sale

I just got done reading the interview by Ben Fowlkes with New York Legislator Bob Reilly in Sports Illustrated.  First of all I have to agree with Fowlkes on the fact that we should give Reilly credit in the fact that he would be interviewed by an apparent proponent of MMA.  You can read the interview on Cagepotato.  There are two parts to the inteview, so access part one here, and part two here.

In reading the interview, it was very apparent to me that Reilly is a typical politician.  He obviously knows what is best for everyone else, and knows that people can’t make decisions on their own, without the help of the government to intervene.  At one point in the interview he says, “Government says what you can and can’t do.”  Hmmm…Bob, I thought it was the role of the government to listen to the people, and govern based on the will of the people.

Fowlkes asks Reilly if he feels like this is a David and Goliath story.  Reilly likens himself to David, where the UFC is Goliath.  Give me a break!  If the UFC were Goliath, they would be doing shows in New York State right now, and Reilly would be trying to get it stopped.  Remember, Reilly has a whole staff of people to find documentation on his stance, he has a budget from the tax payers of the state of New York.  Reilly is no David that is for sure!

Fowlkes asks, “But for one, that was Pride, which had several rule differences between itself and the UFC, and two, harming your opponent to the point of unconsciousness is one of the ways you win a boxing match, isn’t it?”  Reilly’s reply is, “It’s not a stated goal, though.”  Reilly, of course it is a stated goal.  Why do you think they have a “KO” in boxing, because you win the fight if you knock your opponent out.

I could go on and on about this interview, which I thought was very well done by Ben Fowlkes, but the answers Bob Reilly gave were truly rediculous.  This is Bob Reilly’s chance for his 15 minutes of fame.  He is trying to find a soap box to stand on, so when reelection comes up he can have a reason why he should continue to be a legislator.   I was going to broadcast his views on the topic from a YouTube video, but it’s not even worth broadcasting his statements because they don’t make sense.

If New Yorker’s don’t want the UFC or any other type of mixed martial arts venue, fine.  Go somewhere else.  Send the tax revenues to other states and communities who appreciate the dynamics of mixed martial arts.

Inside MMA Gonzaga Carwin Interview on HD Net

Friday, March 6th, 2009

Inside MMA did an interview with Gabrel Gonzaga and Shane Carwin which ended up being a good interview.  Typically, when fighters are interviewed, there is a great amount of trash talk, although typically, they are not on the same interview.  This is an interesting interview because Gonzaga and Carwin are both involved.  At one point Ron Kruck asks the two of them what the others strengths are.  I was impressed that they had clean answers for Kruck and were complementary of the strengths of their opponent.

Gonzaga is 10 -3-0 and Carwin is 10-0-0 in their professional fights.  As stated in the interview, neither one has gotten out of the first round in their last two fights.  This looks to be a good fight.

Check out the interview here:

UFC 96, “Rampage” vs. the “Dean of Mean”

Friday, March 6th, 2009

UFC 96 is this weekend, Saturday March 7, at 10p (eastern time).  Steve Cofield interviews Quinton “Rampage” Jackson at the prefight.  He asks him about his camp preparing for UFC 96, and his mental state preparing for the fight with “The Dean of Mean” Keith Jardine.  It’s interesting to see how Rampage feels about his opponents, before a fight, and his mentality of the competition.  This is a good video showing the mind of Rampage.

YouTube Preview Image